Skip Navigation


International Journal of Refugee Law Advance Access originally published online on April 15, 2008
International Journal of Refugee Law 2008 20(1):166-185; doi:10.1093/ijrl/een009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/166    most recent
een009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Relevance of the Work of the International Criminal Court to Refugee Status Determinations

Matthew Smith*

This article considers the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its overlaps with refugee law and practice. It focuses on ICC complementarity determinations. These involve the organs of the ICC considering whether a state is willing and able to prosecute individuals accused of international crimes. The article draws attention to the fact that such determinations provide information on the extent to which state legal systems are functional and non-discriminatory, and thus able to ensure that those who violate human rights are brought to justice. Such information, it is suggested, can and should be drawn upon in deciding whether there is a real chance that an applicant for refugee status will be able to receive the protection of their state through its justice system. The paper draws on this overlap between the work of the ICC and refugee law and practice to support its concluding recommendation that refugee practitioners should see, and take advantage of, the overlap between the work of the ICC and refugee status inquiries. It is suggested that this will help to ensure that persons deserving international protection get it. It will at the same time bring us another step closer to the development of a fully integrated system for the protection and promotion of human rights.


* BA, LLB (Hons), University of Otago, 2005. Barrister, Stout Street Chambers, Wellington, New Zealand.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.