Skip Navigation


International Journal of Refugee Law Advance Access originally published online on October 17, 2008
International Journal of Refugee Law 2008 20(4):637-666; doi:10.1093/ijrl/een028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/637    most recent
een028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Case Law

Case of N. v. The United Kingdom

European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

(Application no. 26565/05), Strasbourg, 27 May 2008

This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of N. v. the United Kingdom,

The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of:

Jean-Paul Costa, President, Nicolas Bratza, Peer Lorenzen, Françoise Tulkens, Josep Casadevall, Giovanni Bonello, Ireneu Cabral Barreto, Bostjan M. Zupancic, Rait Maruste, Snejana Botoucharova, Javier Borrego Borrego, Khanlar Hajiyev, Ljiljana Mijovic, Dean Spielmann, Renate Jaeger, Ján Sikuta, Mark Villiger, judges, and Michael O'Boyle, Deputy Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 26 September 2007 and on 23 April 2008,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date:


   PROCEDURE
 

1. The case originated in an application (no. 26565/05) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   THE FACTS
 
I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE
II. MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR HIV AND AIDS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND UGANDA

   THE LAW
 
I. ADMISSIBILITY OF THE COMPLAINTS
II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION
A. The parties' submissions
B. The Court's assessment
III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION

   FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT
 

   JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TULKENS, BONELLO AND SPIELMANN
 
I. ARTICLE 3
A. As to the general principles
B. As to the facts of this case
C. As to the potential violation of Article 3
II. ARTICLE 8

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?