Skip Navigation

International Journal of Refugee Law 2007 19(3):536-592; doi:10.1093/ijrl/eem054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Case Law

MT (Algeria), RB (Algeria) and U (Algeria) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on Appeal from the Special Immigration Appeals Commission

Before:

THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS

LORD JUSTICE BUXTON

and

LADY JUSTICE SMITH

Neutral Citation Number: [2007] EWCA Civ 808

Cases Nos: T1/2006/2624, T1/2006/2669 and T1/2007/9505

30 July 2007

Keir Starmer QC and Raza Husain (instructed by Birnberg Peirce and Partners) for the Appellant MT

Rabinder Singh QC and Hugh Southey (instructed by Fisher Meredith) for the Appellant RB

Richard Drabble QC and Hugh Southey (instructed by Birnberg Peirce and Partners) for the Appellant U

Robin Tam QC, Robert Palmer and Caroline Neenan (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Respondent

Judith Farley as Special Advocate for MT

Nicholas Blake QC and M Chamberlain as Special Advocate for RB

Andrew Nicol QC and T de la Mare as Special Advocate for U

(instructed in each case by the Special Advocates Support Office)

Hearing dates:

MT: . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Introduction
 

    Closed material
 
Introduction
The statutory scheme
The effect of article 3 of the Convention
Legality and fairness as a matter of English law
A question of balance
Conclusion as to the use of closed material

    The appeal of Y
 
Introduction
The background facts
The Ordonnance
Article 8
Article 9
Meeting in Algiers on 14 November 2006
Discussion
Remission
Closed material
Article 1F(c) of the Refugee Convention
Disposal of Y's appeal

    The jurisdiction of this court
 
Introduction
The statute and the issue
A mixed question of law and fact
The appellants' case expanded
Authority on proportionality is irrelevant
Fact-finding obligations in a Convention case
The role of "assessment"
Comparison with judicial review
Conclusion as to the court's jurisdiction

    The appeal of BB
 
Background
The factual findings of SIAC
Control of the DRS
SIAC's assessment of the attitudes of the Algerian state
Are assurances ever appropriate?
The terms of the assurances
Monitoring
Conclusion on SIAC's findings of fact
Disclosure of information by the Secretary of State
Prison conditions
Article 6
Disposal of BB's appeal

    The appeal of U
 
Introduction
The appeal to SIAC
The appeal to this court
Karanakaran
Also, the passage at [469g]:
Shamayev
Verification of compliance with assurances
The language of the assurances
Prison conditions
Separate consideration of the risk of torture and bad prison conditions
Article 6
Disposal of U's appeal

    Conclusions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?