Skip Navigation


International Journal of Refugee Law Advance Access originally published online on October 27, 2009
International Journal of Refugee Law 2009 21(4):742-767; doi:10.1093/ijrl/eep024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/4/742    most recent
eep024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darling, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Protection of Stateless Persons in International Asylum and Refugee Law

Kate Darling*

* Kate Darling is a lawyer with the Legal and Constitutional Law Division of the Government of Nunavut in Canada

International refugee law is a mechanism whereby States deal with persons seeking asylum within their borders. While this area of law has its roots in international human rights concepts, it has been influenced by less noble forces over the years. This article looks at how interactions between international human rights law, international relations and domestic decision making have impacted the ability of international refugee law to protect one of the most powerless groups, namely, stateless people.

By exploring the analytical approaches applied by the Courts in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, this article attempts to demonstrate the ways in which stateless persons have been excluded from effective international human rights protection. Specifically, the article argues that states have not considered their own human rights obligations when making individual refugee status decisions. Further, it observes that, in some cases, decision makers have tended to refer to international compendia on international refugee law and international human rights law rather than to reflect directly on the law itself. This in turn has encouraged an increasingly restrictive approach to refugee determination.

In its conclusion, this article offers suggestions for reintegrating the foundations of international human rights law into claim determinations for stateless persons. It suggests that a return to first principles and foundational concepts will realign the implementation of international refugee law with its intended purpose: the protection of the world's most vulnerable people.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.