Skip Navigation


International Journal of Refugee Law Advance Access originally published online on October 17, 2007
International Journal of Refugee Law 2007 19(3):440-470; doi:10.1093/ijrl/eem053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/440    most recent
eem053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, F.
Right arrow Articles by Curran, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Separated Children: A Comparison of the Treatment of Separated Child Refugees Entering Australia and Canada

Fiona Martin* and Jennifer Curran**

* Associate Head of School (Education) and Senior Lecturer, The Australian School of Taxation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
** Program Manager, Ontario Justice Education Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Separated children are in a uniquely vulnerable situation. Not only are they in fear of persecution but they have been separated from their families. They are seeking multifaceted protections. Such children need a country to protect them from further persecution, a caregiver to nurture them and fulfil the family role and a society that will foster their social and intellectual growth. This article analyses the treatment of separated child refugees in the context of international human rights law as it relates to children and from the viewpoint of domestic immigration law. The article bases this analysis on a comparison of the treatment of separated child refugees in Australia and Canada. The fundamental principle of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child is that member states should act in the child's best interests. This principle has two important aspects, firstly, that detention of children should only be used as a last resort and, secondly, that child refugees should enjoy the right to seek asylum. The article examines the domestic law of both Australia and Canada with a view to determining how these two aspects are applied to unaccompanied children.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.