Skip Navigation

International Journal of Refugee Law 2006 18(3-4):537-570; doi:10.1093/ijrl/eel015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Towle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Articles

Processes and Critiques of the Indo-Chinese Comprehensive Plan of Action: An Instrument of International Burden-Sharing?

Richard Towle*

The Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indo-Chinese Refugees was devised to respond to the many thousands of people fleeing Vietnam and Laos in the 1980s. The principal objectives of the CPA 1989 were to reverse that exodus by putting in place the political and practical framework that would stem future irregular flows and return those not in need of international protection. It created a system of refugee status determination (screening) in the countries of first asylum that allowed those who met the criteria to be resettled, but those who fell outside to be returned to their country of origin. While it restored asylum in the region, there were many problems with the CPA that led to concerns that it was merely an example of political expediency.

The CPA forced UNHCR to address many mandate and ethical issues. Under the CPA, UNHCR was the primary vehicle through which many of the burden-sharing arrangements were coordinated and steered. The Agency played a pivotal, and in many respects novel, role in all aspects of the CPA in the region, particularly in Vietnam. For UNHCR, the CPA was confirmation that to protect refugees and the institution of asylum, the organisation had to be actively engaged at all stages and places in the displacement cycle, including with non-refugees and in countries of origin.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
S. Kneebone
Legitimizing Rejection: International Refugee Law in South East Asia. By Sara E. Davies.
Journal of Refugee Studies, June 1, 2009; 22(2): 243 - 245.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
INT RELAT ASIA PACHome page
S. E. Davies
Realistic yet humanitarian? The comprehensive plan of action and refugee policy in Southeast Asia
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, May 1, 2008; 8(2): 191 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.